In a prior post I reflected on why so-called "Masters" end up begging their "slaves," for money; and how, on account of that, "slaves" end up dominating "masters" by telling them what to do in exchange for money (because ultimately slaves pay for something). If the two parts enjoy being in that position, that's fine. Who cares? But I guess the very idea of Tribute (which is supposed to mediante slave-master relationship) fades away to be replaced by a mere Tip. A tribute must come from the slave's deepest necessity to satisfy his master and make him happy. Maters should never ever ask their slaves for money. Slaves should always offer tributes, not plain money. Of course money can be a tribute but the meaning of tribute should not be limited to just $$. A slave must know what makes his Master happy. A tribute can take the shape of money, but it needs to come from the slave's will and the deepest of his heart without being asked for. It cannot be an exchange although at the end the slave will feel accomplished because he has made his Master happy. The nature of being a slave has found meaning, purpose and raison d'être. That must be enough for the slave. But it will never be enough for the Master. Tributes feed slave-master relationship. Plain Money for the sake of money turn it into a market transaction between a buyer and a seller. Why is it so difficult to find a slave who understands that?
