I've noticed an interesting trend where an alpha initiates or joins a conversation, some others can misconstrue this as a sign that the alpha might be a switch or even interested in obedience. It's as if merely engaging in conversation is now seen as a potential threat to their dominance. But does this really reflect a flaw in the alpha, or does it say more about the insecurities and assumptions of others?
The ability to chat and engage with others, in my opinion, is a sign of confidence. Alphas who can have open discussions aren't threatened by the presence of others—whether they are subs, switches, or fellow doms. They're secure in their own identity and dominance. But when others perceive a simple conversation as a weakness, it's worth considering why this is happening.
Has the role of an alpha become so rigidly defined that any deviation from a stereotypical image leads to misconceptions? Or perhaps this is about power dynamics and the fear that any interaction might shift the balance, even momentarily.
For me, the real threat comes not from having a conversation, but from the idea that engaging with others could be perceived as weakness. A true alpha knows that their dominance isn't undermined by talking to others. In fact, it can strengthen their presence and connections within the community.
So, is it that alphas are seeing others as a threat? Or is the real threat the narrow perceptions we place on dominance and obedience roles?
How do you see interactions between doms? Do you think the willingness to chat, exchange ideas, or even laugh together challenges the dynamic, or do you believe it’s a sign of deeper strength?
Owned Fags is a male only site which deals with adult themes
You should only view this site if you are over the age of 18, male and are not easily offended.